From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Juron v. Minzner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 1999
261 A.D.2d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 24, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Berke, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The record demonstrates that there is an identity of issues and parties between this action and a corporate dissolution proceeding previously commenced in Westchester County. Moreover, the plaintiff, Albert A. Juron, and the defendant Edward S. Minzner stipulated to have all issues regarding their respective financial interests in their former law firm resolved in the dissolution proceeding. Under these circumstances, any perceived inequity in the continued distribution of the assets of the former law firm must be raised and addressed in the context of the Westchester County proceeding. Therefore, the Supreme Court, Queens County, should have granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint in this action.

Sullivan, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Smith, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Juron v. Minzner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 1999
261 A.D.2d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Juron v. Minzner

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT A. JURON, Respondent, v. EDWARD S. MINZNER et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 24, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
690 N.Y.S.2d 682

Citing Cases

Raik v. Developers

Contrary to the plaintiff's contentions, the Supreme Court properly determined that the resolution of the…

Malick v. 302 E. 105th St.

Resolution of the issues raised in this dissolution action would be duplicative and counterproductive given…