From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jurin v. Google, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
No. 2:09-cv-03065-MCE-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-03065-MCE-CKD

01-18-2012

DANIEL JURIN, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

Keith D. Cable of the firm Cable Gallagher (hereafter "Counsel") seeks leave of this Court to withdraw as Plaintiff's attorney. Counsel's declaration submitted in support of the instant motion is deficient in one respect: the Court has not been provided with Plaintiff's last known address. See Local Rule 182 (d) ("The attorney shall provide an affidavit stating the current or last known address or addresses of the client."). Accordingly, Counsel is hereby ordered, not later than two days following the date this Order is electronically filed, to file a supplemental declaration providing that required information. The Court will defer ruling on Counsel's motion until that supplemental declaration is received.

Because oral argument will not be of material assistance, the Court orders this matter submitted on the briefing. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jurin v. Google, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
No. 2:09-cv-03065-MCE-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Jurin v. Google, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL JURIN, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-03065-MCE-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)