From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jurek v. Estelle

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 5, 1979
597 F.2d 590 (5th Cir. 1979)

Opinion

No. 78-1374.

June 5, 1979.

Jay Topkis, New York City, John Charles Boger, New York City, for petitioner-appellant.

John L. Hill, Atty. Gen., Anita Ashton, R. Kristin Weaver, David M. Kendall, Jr., Gilbert Pena, Asst. Attys. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Owen D. Cox, Judge.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion April 23, 1979, 5 Cir., 1979, 593 F.2d 672).


A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.


Summaries of

Jurek v. Estelle

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 5, 1979
597 F.2d 590 (5th Cir. 1979)
Case details for

Jurek v. Estelle

Case Details

Full title:JERRY LANE JUREK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. W. J. ESTELLE, JR., DIRECTOR…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 5, 1979

Citations

597 F.2d 590 (5th Cir. 1979)

Citing Cases

Jurek v. Estelle

A petition for rehearing en banc was granted by a majority of the judges then on this court. Jurek v.…