Opinion
Case No. 5D22-1058
05-17-2022
Andrew A. Labbe, of Groelle & Salmon, P.A., Tampa, for Petitioner. Michael D. Crosbie, and Caitlin N. Emling, of Shutts & Bowen LLP, Orlando, for Respondents.
Andrew A. Labbe, of Groelle & Salmon, P.A., Tampa, for Petitioner.
Michael D. Crosbie, and Caitlin N. Emling, of Shutts & Bowen LLP, Orlando, for Respondents.
PER CURIAM. Don K. Juravin petitions this Court for a writ of prohibition, challenging the trial court's refusal to stay the underlying proceedings despite the declaration of insolvency obtained and filed by Juravin's insurer. It is undisputed that the insurer has declared insolvency and has entered receivership, and that the trial court has refused to stay the proceedings "because the insurer is not a named party to the lawsuit." This was error.
Section 631.67, Florida Statutes (2021), provides that all proceedings in which an insolvent insurer is a party or is obligated to defend a party shall be stayed for six months. This Court has previously held that the stay provided for in section 631.67 is both automatic and mandatory, and that the stay must be to the entire proceeding. Halili v. Radiation OncologyConsultants, P.A., 820 So. 2d 415, 416–17 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (citing JimmyLang's Auto Serv. v. Proctor, 667 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) ). We agree with Juravin that the six-month stay (from the February 25, 2022 insolvency order) provided by the statute prohibits continuation of these judicial proceedings so long as Juravin's insurer remains obligated to provide a defense.
PETITION GRANTED.
EVANDER, HARRIS and SASSO, JJ., concur.