From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Junot v. Faulkner

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 22, 2023
3:22-cv-00083 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 22, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00083

02-22-2023

TERRANCE JUNOT, Petitioner, v. SHAWN FAULKNER, et al., Respondents.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Mark R. Hornak, Chief United States District Judge

This civil action was referred to Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly for a report and recommendation. It is a petition for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (ECF No. 8). Judge Kelly prepared a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that the petition be dismissed for want of prosecution. (ECF No. 20). The R&R was served on the Petitioner, with instructions as to the filing of objections to the R&R, and setting forth the time period for doing so. That period has expired, and no Objections to the R&R have been filed.

The undersigned has nonetheless carefully considered de novo the matters set forth in the petition, the papers of record and the R&R, and upon such review concludes that the R&R is correct in all respects and is in accord with the applicable law, and it is therefore adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

The petition, and this civil action, are therefore DISMISSED for the reasons set forth in the R&R. The provisions of law relative to a certificate of appealability are not applicable to this action, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Clerk shall close the case.


Summaries of

Junot v. Faulkner

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 22, 2023
3:22-cv-00083 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 22, 2023)
Case details for

Junot v. Faulkner

Case Details

Full title:TERRANCE JUNOT, Petitioner, v. SHAWN FAULKNER, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 22, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-00083 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 22, 2023)