From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gofan Junior v. Pereksta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Nov 22, 2016
Civil Action No. 16-8559 (PGS) (D.N.J. Nov. 22, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 16-8559 (PGS)

11-22-2016

HENRY SAYE GOFAN JUNIOR, Plaintiff, v. DARLENE J. PEREKSTA, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff Henry Saye Gofan Junior, a prisoner currently confined at the Mercer County Correction Center in Trenton, New Jersey, seeks to bring this civil action in forma pauperis, without prepayment of fees or security, asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act"), which amends 28 U.S.C. § 1915, establishes certain financial requirements for prisoners who are attempting to bring a civil action in forma pauperis.

Under the Act, a prisoner bringing a civil action in forma pauperis must submit an affidavit, including a statement of all assets, which states that the prisoner is unable to pay the fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The prisoner also must submit a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). The prisoner must obtain this statement from the appropriate official of each prison at which he was or is confined. Id.

The entire fee to be paid in advance of filing a civil complaint is $400. That fee includes a filing fee of $350 plus an administrative fee of $50, for a total of $400. A prisoner who is granted in forma pauperis status will, instead, be assessed a filing fee of $350 and will not be responsible for the $50 administrative fee. If in forma pauperis status is denied, the prisoner must pay the full $400, including the $350 filing fee and the $50 administrative fee, before the complaint will be filed.

If the prisoner is granted in forma pauperis status, the prisoner must pay the full amount of the $350 filing fee as follows. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). In each month that the amount in the prisoner's account exceeds $10.00, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid, the agency having custody of the prisoner shall assess, deduct from the prisoner's account, and forward to the Clerk of the Court, payment equal to 20% of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

Plaintiff may not have known when he submitted his complaint that he must pay the filing fee, and that even if the full filing fee, or any part of it, has been paid, the Court must dismiss the case if it finds that the action is: (1) frivolous or malicious; (2) fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (3) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). If the Court dismisses the case for any of these reasons, the Act does not permit the prisoner to get his filing fee back.

In this action, Plaintiff fails to submit a complete in forma pauperis application as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Specifically, Plaintiff fails to submit a proper six-month prison account statement. The application attaches a prison account statement dated from April 1, 2016 to May 10, 2016, see ECF No. 1-2 at 4, which does not cover the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the Complaint as required by § 1915—the Complaint is dated November 8, 2016, ECF No. 1 at 63, and Plaintiff also attaches an exhibit wherein he describes an incident that occurred on November 10, 2016, ECF No. 1-3 at 1, demonstrating that the Complaint was placed into the prison mail system sometime after November 10, 2016. As such, Plaintiff's application does not satisfy the statutory requirement; Plaintiff must submit a prison account statement for the period between May 10, 2016 and November 10, 2016.

IT IS therefore on this 22 day of November, 2016,

ORDERED that Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this case, without filing the complaint or assessing a filing fee; Plaintiff is informed that administrative termination is not a "dismissal" for purposes of the statute of limitations, and that if the case is reopened, it is not subject to the statute of limitations time bar if it was originally filed timely, see Jenkins v. Superintendent of Laurel Highlands, 705 F.3d 80, 84 n.2 (3d Cir. 2013) (describing prisoner mailbox rule generally); Dasilva v. Sheriff's Dep't, 413 F. App'x 498, 502 (3rd Cir. 2011) ("[The] statute of limitations is met when a complaint is submitted to the clerk before the statute runs[.]"); it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall send Plaintiff the form entitled Affidavit of Poverty and Account Certification (Civil Rights)(DNJ ProSe 007 A(Rev. 5/13)) to be used by Plaintiff in any future application to proceed in forma pauperis; it is further

ORDERED that if Plaintiff wishes to reopen this case, he shall so notify the Court, in writing addressed to the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order; Plaintiff's writing shall include either (1) a complete, signed in forma pauperis application, including a proper certified six-month prison account statement, or (2) the $400 fee including the $350 filing fee plus the $50 administrative fee; it is further

ORDERED that upon receipt of a writing from Plaintiff stating that he wishes to reopen this case, and either a complete in forma pauperis application or payment of the filing and administrative fees within the time allotted by this Court, the Clerk will be directed to reopen this case; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff by regular mail.

/s/_________

Peter G. Sheridan, U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Gofan Junior v. Pereksta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Nov 22, 2016
Civil Action No. 16-8559 (PGS) (D.N.J. Nov. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Gofan Junior v. Pereksta

Case Details

Full title:HENRY SAYE GOFAN JUNIOR, Plaintiff, v. DARLENE J. PEREKSTA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Nov 22, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 16-8559 (PGS) (D.N.J. Nov. 22, 2016)