From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Julius v. PNC Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jan 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-00026-UNA (D.D.C. Jan. 10, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-00026-UNA

01-10-2012

TYRONE JULIUS, Plaintiff, v. PNC BANK, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and her pro se complaint. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint.

Although the plaintiff manages to demand a trial without a jury and damages of $999,999,999,999.00, the complaint is completely devoid of a meaningful factual allegation. At most the complaint's purported assertions "constitute the sort of patently insubstantial claims" that deprive the Court of subject matter jurisdiction. Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1010 (D.C. Cir. 2009); see Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330 (D.C. Cir. 1994).

An Order is issued separately.

____________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Julius v. PNC Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jan 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-00026-UNA (D.D.C. Jan. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Julius v. PNC Bank

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE JULIUS, Plaintiff, v. PNC BANK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Jan 10, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-00026-UNA (D.D.C. Jan. 10, 2012)