From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Julius Schmid, Inc. v. Youngs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 1937
249 App. Div. 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

January 15, 1937.

Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.


The matter pleaded in the second cause of action is so general that it cannot be said that it applies to plaintiff. ( Feely v. Vitagraph Co., 184 App. Div. 527.) It may be, however, that plaintiff is able to plead a proper cause of action. ( Gross v. Cantor, 270 N.Y. 93.) Order modified by striking out the second cause of action, and as so modified affirmed, without costs, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within ten days after service of order. No opinion.


Summaries of

Julius Schmid, Inc. v. Youngs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 15, 1937
249 App. Div. 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Julius Schmid, Inc. v. Youngs

Case Details

Full title:JULIUS SCHMID, INC., Respondent, v. MERLE L. YOUNGS and YOUNGS RUBBER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 15, 1937

Citations

249 App. Div. 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)