From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Julie Lawyer v. Leno (In re Interest of Leno)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Jan 22, 2018
905 N.W.2d 899 (N.D. 2018)

Opinion

No. 20170289

01-22-2018

IN the INTEREST OF Patrick Lee LENO Julie Lawyer, Assistant State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee v. Patrick Lee Leno, Respondent and Appellant

Julie A. Lawyer, Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, petitioner and appellee. Kent M. Morrow, Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellant.


Julie A. Lawyer, Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, petitioner and appellee.

Kent M. Morrow, Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellant.

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Patrick Leno appeals a district court order continuing his commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. Leno argues the order was not supported by clear and convincing evidence. We conclude the district court's findings of fact are supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Jon J. Jensen


Summaries of

Julie Lawyer v. Leno (In re Interest of Leno)

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Jan 22, 2018
905 N.W.2d 899 (N.D. 2018)
Case details for

Julie Lawyer v. Leno (In re Interest of Leno)

Case Details

Full title:IN the INTEREST OF Patrick Lee LENO Julie Lawyer, Assistant State's…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Date published: Jan 22, 2018

Citations

905 N.W.2d 899 (N.D. 2018)