From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jules-Wallace Co., Inc., v. R.A. Management

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 15, 1933
148 Misc. 180 (N.Y. App. Term 1933)

Opinion

June 15, 1933.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Third District.

Leonard Biel, for the appellant.

Lynn G. Goodnough [ Morris P. Glushein of counsel], for the respondent.


Under the authorities it would seem that the validity of the assignment herein is to be tested as of the date when the power of attorney was executed. ( Thompson v. Erie R.R. Co., 207 N.Y. 171; Thompson v. Gimbel Bros., 71 Misc. 126; affd., 145 A.D. 436; affd., 207 N.Y. 659.) So tested the assignment is void as against public policy or at least not enforcible in an action at law against the employer, for the reason that it is an assignment of wages under a contract for employment not then existing. ( Cooper v. Douglass, 44 Barb. 409; Williston Cont. § 414; Restatement, Contracts, § 154, subd. 2.)

Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs.

All concur; present, LYDON, CALLAHAN and FRANKENTHALER, JJ.


Summaries of

Jules-Wallace Co., Inc., v. R.A. Management

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 15, 1933
148 Misc. 180 (N.Y. App. Term 1933)
Case details for

Jules-Wallace Co., Inc., v. R.A. Management

Case Details

Full title:JULES-WALLACE CO., INC., Appellant, v. R.A. MANAGEMENT, INC., Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 15, 1933

Citations

148 Misc. 180 (N.Y. App. Term 1933)
265 N.Y.S. 202

Citing Cases

MATTER OF MARCOMO STEVEDORING CORP. v. Nathanson

The wage assignee also argues that the filing of the assignment in the County Clerk's office in Queens and…

Matter of Marcomo Stevedoring Corp. v. Nathanson

The wage assignee also argues that the filing of the assignment in the County Clerk's office in Queens and…