Jules v. Monica

Full title: PIERRE JULES, Petitioner v. DONALD MONICA, District Director, et al.…

Court: United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 2, 2005

Civil No. 4:CV-04-2429 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 2, 2005)

Opinion

Civil No. 4:CV-04-2429.

June 2, 2005

ORDER

JOHN E. JONES, District Judge

Petitioner, Pierre Jules ("Jules" or "Petitioner"), filed this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("the Petition") on November 8, 2004, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He challenges an order of removal issued by an Immigration Judge, ordering Jules removed from the United States to Haiti. (See Rec. Doc. 1). Presently pending before the Court is the Respondents' Motion to Transfer the Petition to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ("the Motion"), pursuant to the REAL ID Act of 2005, H.R. 1268, 109^th Cong. (2005). (See Rec. Doc. 8).

For the reasons that follow, the Motion will be granted and the Petition will be transferred to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

Respondents contend that "Section 106 of the REAL ID Act of 2005 amended section 242(a) of the INA to provide that the sole and exclusive means to review an order of removal shall be by petition for review in the applicable court of appeals. H.R. 1268, 109^th Cong. (2005) (enacted), Pub.L. No. 109-13, Div.B, 119 Stat. 231." (See Rec. Doc. 9, at 3). The amendment became effective on May 11, 2005. Section 106(c) provides that "[i]f an alien's case, brought under section 2241 of title 28, United States Code, and challenging a final administrative order of removal, deportation, or exclusion, is pending in a district court on the date of the enactment of this division, then the district court shall transfer the case (or the part of the case that challenges the order of removal, deportation, or exclusion) to the court of appeals for the circuit in which a petition for review could have been properly filed under section 242(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1252), as amended by this section, or under section 309(c)(4)(D) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 ( 8 U.S.C. 1101 note). The court of appeals shall treat the transferred case as if it had been filed pursuant to a petition for review under section 242, except that subsection (b)(1) of such section shall not apply." As Jules is challenging a final administrative order of removal, Section 106(c) mandates transfer of the matter to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Respondents' Motion to Transfer (doc. 8) is GRANTED.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to TRANSFER the instant action to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.