From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Judy v. Paddock Park SC, Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION
Mar 20, 2012
Case No. 5:12-cv-20-Oc-10TBS (M.D. Fla. Mar. 20, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 5:12-cv-20-Oc-10TBS

03-20-2012

JEFFREY JOEL JUDY, Plaintiff, v. PADDOCK PARK SC, LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership, Defendant.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion for More Definite Statement. (Doc. 8). A review of the record reveals that Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint (Doc. 9), which renders moot the original complaint that was the target of Defendant's motion. See Malowney v. Federal Collection Deposit Group, 193 F.3d 1342, 1345 n.1 (11th Cir. 1999) (noting that "[a]n amended complaint supersedes a previously filed complaint"); see also Meterlogic, Inc. v. Copier Solutions, Inc., 185 F. Supp. 2d 1292, 1297 (S.D. Fla. 2002) (noting that the plaintiff's filing of an amended complaint "rendered moot the parties previous pleadings and the defendants' summary judgment and Daubert motions"). Upon due consideration, Defendant's motion (Doc. 8) is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Ocala, Florida, on March 20, 2012.

Copies to all Counsel

_____________

THOMAS B. SMITH

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Judy v. Paddock Park SC, Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION
Mar 20, 2012
Case No. 5:12-cv-20-Oc-10TBS (M.D. Fla. Mar. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Judy v. Paddock Park SC, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY JOEL JUDY, Plaintiff, v. PADDOCK PARK SC, LTD., a Florida Limited…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 20, 2012

Citations

Case No. 5:12-cv-20-Oc-10TBS (M.D. Fla. Mar. 20, 2012)