Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Department of Army

Full title: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: May 31, 2006

Civil Action No. 04-301 (RMU), Document No. 18 (D.D.C. May. 31, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-301 (RMU), Document No. 18.

May 31, 2006

ORDER

RICARDO URBINA, District Judge

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDERING THE DEFENDANT TO PRODUCE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS

For the reasons stated in this court's Memorandum Opinion separately and contemporaneously issued this 31st day of May, 2006, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant produce the following documents: CE523-524, CE555, CE580-585,¹ CE3720, CE2539-2588, CE6838, CE6871-6873, CE6899, CE484-485, CE486-487, CE567-576, CE5242-5244, CE5245-5246, and CE6610-6619, and it is

1 If the government still asserts that this is a draft document, they may provide additional supporting information to the court for review. Otherwise, the government must disclose this document.

ORDERED that the defendant produce the following documents to the court for in camera review within 15 days of this order and to show cause why it failed to produce these documents as part of its first in camera production: CE545, CE4431, CE5352-5385, CE5554, CE5919, and CE6755-6756.

SO ORDERED.