From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Judge v. Philadelphia Premium Outlets

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 8, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1553 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 8, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1553.

June 8, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 8th day of June, 2010, upon consideration of Plaintiff Jack Judge, Jr.'s Motion for Remand (Docket No. 9), the Response of Defendants Philadelphia Premium Outlets, Chelsea Limerick Holdings, LLC, Simon Property Group, Inc., and Chelsea Property Group, Inc. (Docket No. 14), and Plaintiff's Reply Brief (Docket No. 15), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Judge v. Philadelphia Premium Outlets

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 8, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1553 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Judge v. Philadelphia Premium Outlets

Case Details

Full title:JACK JUDGE, JR. Plaintiff, v. PHILADELPHIA PREMIUM OUTLETS, et al…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 8, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1553 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

Hensler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

In general, the removal period is not triggered by service of the complaint when, as is the case here, "a…

Johnson v. Tesla Motors, Inc.

It is not necessary that the amount in controversy be stated in the initial pleading in order to trigger the…