Opinion
CIVIL 1:23-cv-00016-MR
01-15-2024
CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY JUDD, Plaintiff, v. BUNCOMBE COUNTY, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Martin Reidinger Chief United States District Judge
THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte.
The pro se Plaintiff filed the Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 11, 2023, addressing incidents that allegedly occurred at the Buncombe County Detention Center in 2016 and in 2019. [Doc. 1]. On November 28, 2023, the Court notified the Plaintiff that the Complaint appeared to be time-barred on its face, and it ordered the Plaintiff to file a memorandum within 30 days, explaining why the Complaint is timely. [Doc. 17]. The Court cautioned him that “[i]f Plaintiff fails to timely comply, the Complaint will likely be dismissed with prejudice as time-barred without further notice.” [Id. at 3].
The Plaintiff has not responded to the Court's Order, and the time to do so has expired. This action will, therefore, be dismissed with prejudice as time-barred for the reasons previously discussed. [See id.].
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A and 1915(e).
The Clerk is respectfully instructed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.