Opinion
No. 05-04-00684-CR
Opinion Filed January 24, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F96-49992-RQ. Affirm.
Before Justices WRIGHT, O'NEILL, and FRANCIS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jose Luis Juarez waived a jury trial and pleaded not guilty to murder. After the trial court found appellant guilty, appellant pleaded true to one enhancement paragraph. The trial court found the enhancement paragraph true and sentenced appellant to thirty-five years imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response, but appellant did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.