Opinion
Case No. 11-CIV-0748 KJN
09-01-2011
ROSIE GRIJALVA JUAREZ Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE Commissioner of Social Security of the United States of America, Defendant.
BESS M. BREWER Attorney at Law Attorney for Plaintiff Benjamin B. Wagner United States Attorney DAVID LERCH Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant
BESS M. BREWER, #100364
LAW OFFICE OF
BESS M. BREWER & ASSOCIATES
Attorneys for Plaintiff
STIPULATION AND
TIME TO FILE SUMMARY JUDGEMENT MOTION
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their attorneys, that the Plaintiff's time to file his summary judgment is hereby extended from August 29, 2011, to October19, 2011. This is Plaintiff's first extension and is required due to Plaintiff's counsel's impacted briefing schedule and need to prioritize older cases.
BESS M. BREWER
Attorney at Law
Attorney for Plaintiff
Benjamin B. Wagner
United States Attorney
DAVID LERCH
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER
The stipulation of the parties is HEREBY APPROVED. Plaintiff shall have until October 19, 2011, to file a motion for summary judgment. The court's scheduling order is modified accordingly.
The undersigned notes that plaintiff, who is represented by an attorney who appears regularly before the undersigned and all too regularly seeks extensions of time based on her "impacted briefing schedule," filed this stipulation and proposed order on the day that plaintiff was required to file a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's counsel is again admonished that, pursuant to Local Rule 144(d), "[c]ounsel shall seek to obtain a necessary extension from the Court or from other counsel or parties in an action as soon as the need for an extension becomes apparent," and that requests for court-approved extensions brought on or after the required filing date "are looked upon with disfavor." The undersigned also notes that plaintiff's counsel appears to be falling behind in her cases again—plaintiff's counsel filed four requests for extensions in four separate cases between August 26, 2011, and August 29, 2011. (See Pacheco v. Astrue, No. 2:10-cv-1733 KJN (E.D. Cal.); Carson v. Astrue, No. 2:11-cv-0632 KJN (E.D. Cal.); Feltis v. Astrue, No. 2:11-cv-0723 KJN (E.D. Cal.); Juarez v. Astrue, No. 2:10-cv-0748 KJN (E.D. Cal.).)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE