From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Juarez-Juarez v. Garland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 31, 2023
No. 23-1149 (4th Cir. Aug. 31, 2023)

Opinion

23-1149

08-31-2023

FRANCISCA YANELI JUAREZ-JUAREZ; V.M.L.J., Petitioners, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.

Juan Laguna, LAW OFFICE OF JUAN LAGUNA, Santa Ana, California, for Petitioners. Brian Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Assistant Director, Lindsay Dunn, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: August 29, 2023

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

ON BRIEF

Juan Laguna, LAW OFFICE OF JUAN LAGUNA, Santa Ana, California, for Petitioners.

Brian Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Assistant Director, Lindsay Dunn, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Petitioners Francisca Yaneli Juarez-Juarez and her minor daughter, V.M.L.J., natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing their appeal from the immigration judge's oral decision denying Juarez-Juarez's applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Upon review of the administrative record in conjunction with the arguments raised in this court, we are satisfied that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Juarez-Juarez (B.I.A. Jan. 17, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.


Summaries of

Juarez-Juarez v. Garland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 31, 2023
No. 23-1149 (4th Cir. Aug. 31, 2023)
Case details for

Juarez-Juarez v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCA YANELI JUAREZ-JUAREZ; V.M.L.J., Petitioners, v. MERRICK B…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 31, 2023

Citations

No. 23-1149 (4th Cir. Aug. 31, 2023)