From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.R. v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Aug 28, 2019
278 So. 3d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 4D19-1538

08-28-2019

J.R., a Child, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Howard Finkelstein, Public Defender, and Lisa S. Lawlor, Assistant Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for respondent.


Howard Finkelstein, Public Defender, and Lisa S. Lawlor, Assistant Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

We grant the petition for writ of prohibition because the circuit court lost jurisdiction over the petitioner, who turned 20 years old on May 13, 2019. Petitioner was sentenced without the comprehensive evaluation required by section 985.185(1), Florida Statutes (2018). Once his sentence was reversed, he was no longer "committed to the department" within the meaning of section 985.0301(5). Therefore, the circuit court was bound by section 985.0301(5)(a), which states that the court retains jurisdiction "until the child reaches 19 years of age." To rule otherwise, would be to add words to the plain language of the statute.

Levine, C.J., Warner and Gross, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

J.R. v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Aug 28, 2019
278 So. 3d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

J.R. v. State

Case Details

Full title:J.R., a child, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 28, 2019

Citations

278 So. 3d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)