Opinion
12-01-2016
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Mamadi KABA, Defendant–Respondent, DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral–Genossenschaftsbank, et al., Defendants.
Parker Ibrahim & Berg LLC, New York (Scott W. Parker of counsel), for appellant. Mamadi Kaba, respondent pro se.
Parker Ibrahim & Berg LLC, New York (Scott W. Parker of counsel), for appellant.
Mamadi Kaba, respondent pro se.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered April 10, 2014, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff's motion for an order of reference and granted defendant Mamadi Kaba's cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the cross motion denied.
The motion court did not have the benefit of Aurora Loan Servs., LLC v. Taylor, 25 N.Y.3d 355, 12 N.Y.S.3d 612, 34 N.E.3d 363 (2015), which said, “to have standing, it is not necessary to have possession of the mortgage at the time the action is commenced.... [T]he note, and not the mortgage, is the dispositive instrument that conveys standing to foreclose under New York law” (id. at 361, 12 N.Y.S.3d 612, 34 N.E.3d 363 ). Therefore, the court's finding that plaintiff lacked standing because it did not own the mortgage at the time it commenced this action, cannot stand.
TOM, J.P., ACOSTA, ANDRIAS, MOSKOWITZ, KAHN, JJ., concur.