Opinion
No. 3D19-1252
12-22-2021
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellant, v. Jorge LLOVET, et al., Appellees.
León Cosgrove, LLP, and Derek E. León, Andrew B. Boese, and John R. Byrne, for appellant. Jacobs Legal, PLLC, and Bruce Jacobs, for appellee Jorge Llovet.
León Cosgrove, LLP, and Derek E. León, Andrew B. Boese, and John R. Byrne, for appellant.
Jacobs Legal, PLLC, and Bruce Jacobs, for appellee Jorge Llovet.
Before EMAS, LOGUE and HENDON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., a non-party to the litigation below, seeks review of the denial of its motion for a protective order from post-judgment discovery pursuant to a subpoena. In a companion proceeding before this Court, stemming from the same case, and involving the same parties, lawyers, and issue, but a different subpoena, we reversed an order denying JPMorgan Chase's motion for a protective order since " Llovet is barred from re-opening discovery post-judgment because the discovery he now seeks could have been requested pre-judgment." JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Llovet, No. 3D19-1118, 330 So.3d 1006, 1010 (Fla. 3d DCA Nov. 17, 2021). For the same reason, we reverse the order under review and remand for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.