From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Home

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 6, 2010
2:08-CV-01711-PMP-RJJ, BASE FILE 2:08-CV-01717-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01714-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01715-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01709-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01713-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01716-PMP-RJJ (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2010)

Opinion

2:08-CV-01711-PMP-RJJ, BASE FILE 2:08-CV-01717-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01714-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01715-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01709-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01713-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01716-PMP-RJJ.

December 6, 2010


ORDER


On November 15, 2010, the Court entered an Order (Doc. #373) requiring the parties to show cause why each of the sealed filings relating to confirming or vacating the arbitration award (Doc. Nos. 313, 322-23, 326-27, 332-36, and 339) should not be unsealed. Having read and considered the Responses filed by Focus (Doc. #380), JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Doc. #381) and the Builder Members (Doc. #382), and finding no compelling reason exists to warrant further sealing of the documents in question,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall unseal the arbitration award and Docket Numbers 313, 322-23, 326-27, 332-36, and 339.

DATED: December 6, 2010


Summaries of

Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Home

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Dec 6, 2010
2:08-CV-01711-PMP-RJJ, BASE FILE 2:08-CV-01717-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01714-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01715-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01709-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01713-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01716-PMP-RJJ (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Home

Case Details

Full title:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. KB HOME et al., Defendants. AND…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Dec 6, 2010

Citations

2:08-CV-01711-PMP-RJJ, BASE FILE 2:08-CV-01717-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01714-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01715-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01709-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01713-PMP-RJJ, 2:08-CV-01716-PMP-RJJ (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2010)