From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Prof'l Pharmacy II

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
May 31, 2012
NO. 02-11-00373-CV (Tex. App. May. 31, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 02-11-00373-CV

05-31-2012

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. APPELLANT v. PROFESSIONAL PHARMACY II APPELLEES AND CAMBRIDGE GORBUTT MOB, L.P.


FROM THE 17TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered "Appellant's Agreed Motion To Dismiss Appeal As To Cambridge Only." It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as to appellee Cambridge Gorbutt MOB, L.P. only. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). This case shall hereafter be styled "JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Professional Pharmacy II."

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same as between appellant and appellee Cambridge Gorbutt MOB, L.P., for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Prof'l Pharmacy II

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
May 31, 2012
NO. 02-11-00373-CV (Tex. App. May. 31, 2012)
Case details for

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Prof'l Pharmacy II

Case Details

Full title:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. APPELLANT v. PROFESSIONAL PHARMACY II APPELLEES…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: May 31, 2012

Citations

NO. 02-11-00373-CV (Tex. App. May. 31, 2012)