From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joyner v. Upton

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Mar 29, 2010
NO. 5:10-cv-119 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 29, 2010)

Opinion

NO. 5:10-cv-119 (HL).

March 29, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff LEVERN JOYNER, an inmate at Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison ("GD CP") in Jackson, Georgia, has tendered a "Motion for Emergency Injunction," construed as a civil rights complaint. He also seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Tab # 2).

Under the "three strikes" provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), a prisoner is generally precluded from proceeding in forma pauperis if at least three prior lawsuits or appeals by the prisoner were dismissed as frivolous, malicious or failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Dismissal without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and dismissal for abuse of judicial process are also properly counted as strikes. See Rivera v. Allin, 144 F.3d 719 (11th Cir. 1998). Section 1915(g) provides an exception to the three strikes rule, under which an inmate may proceed in forma pauperis if he alleges he is in "imminent danger of serious physical injury." The prisoner must allege a present imminent danger, as opposed to a past danger, to proceed under section 1915(g)'s imminent danger exception. Medberry v. Butler, 185 F.3d 1189, 1193 (11th Cir. 1999).

A review of court records on the U.S. District Web PACER Docket Report reveals that plaintiff, while incarcerated, has filed several civil actions in federal court. At present, three of the complaints were dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 for frivolity, malice, or failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Joyner v. Smith, 4:07-cv-140-HLM (N.D. Ga. Aug. 2, 2007); Joyner v. Stepp, 1:07-cv-44-TWT (N.D. Ga. Feb. 8, 2007); and Joyner v. Upton, 1:06-cv-1401-TWT (N.D. Ga. June 27, 2006).

As plaintiff has three strikes, he cannot proceed in forma pauperis in the instant case unless he qualifies for the "imminent danger of serious physical injury" exception of section 1915(g). Plaintiff requests that this Court issue an order directing officials at GD CP to rule upon his grievance relating to a January 7, 2010 incident of violence involving plaintiff and other inmates. Plaintiff makes no allegations that he was under "imminent danger of serious physical injury" on March 23, 2010, the date he signed his motion.

Because plaintiff has three prior strikes and does not appear to be in imminent danger of serious physical injury, his request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED and the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. If plaintiff wishes to bring a new civil rights action, he may do so by submitting new complaint forms and the entire $350.00 filing fee at the time of filing the complaint. As the Eleventh Circuit stated in Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002), a prisoner cannot simply pay the filing fee after being denied in forma pauperis status; he must pay the filing fee at the time he initiates the suit.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Joyner v. Upton

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Mar 29, 2010
NO. 5:10-cv-119 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Joyner v. Upton

Case Details

Full title:LEVERN JOYNER, Plaintiff v. STEVE UPTON, et al., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division

Date published: Mar 29, 2010

Citations

NO. 5:10-cv-119 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 29, 2010)