From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joyner v. Eastridge

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jan 17, 2008
No. 02-07-199-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 17, 2008)

Opinion

No. 02-07-199-CV

Delivered: January 17, 2008.

Appealed from the 78th District Court of Wichita County.

PANEL B: WALKER, LIVINGSTON, and McCOY, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On December 5, 2007, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).


Summaries of

Joyner v. Eastridge

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jan 17, 2008
No. 02-07-199-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 17, 2008)
Case details for

Joyner v. Eastridge

Case Details

Full title:DAVID LORENZA JOYNER, APPELLANT v. MICHAEL EASTRIDGE, BRAD LIVINGSTON…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jan 17, 2008

Citations

No. 02-07-199-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 17, 2008)