From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joyner v. Appaman Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 12, 2022
22-CV-2226 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-2226 (VSB)

07-12-2022

SHARON JOYNER, Plaintiff, v. APPAMAN INC., Defendant.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 11, 2022, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B). “[W]hen a plaintiff properly amends [a] complaint after a defendant has filed a motion to dismiss that is still pending, the district court has the option of either denying the pending motion as moot or evaluating the motion in light of the facts alleged in the amended complaint.” Pettaway v. Nat'l Recovery Sols., LLC, 955 F.3d 299, 303-04 (2d Cir. 2020). Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that Defendant shall file a letter within seven (7) days indicating whether its motion to dismiss should be deemed moot without prejudice to refile a new motion to dismiss in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), or if I should evaluate Defendant's current motion to dismiss in light of the facts alleged in the amended complaint.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Joyner v. Appaman Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 12, 2022
22-CV-2226 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Joyner v. Appaman Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SHARON JOYNER, Plaintiff, v. APPAMAN INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 12, 2022

Citations

22-CV-2226 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2022)