Joyner v. Alston & Bird LLP

Full title: DAWN M. JOYNER, Plaintiff, v. ALSTON & BIRD LLP, RICHARD HAYS, in his…

Court: United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 1, 2022

Civil Action 21 Civ. 8549 (AT) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 1, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 21 Civ. 8549 (AT) (SLC)

07-01-2022

DAWN M. JOYNER, Plaintiff, v. ALSTON & BIRD LLP, RICHARD HAYS, in his official and individual capacities, CATHY BENTON, in her official and individual capacities; MICHAEL STEPHENS, in his official and individual capacities, Defendants.

SARAH L. CAVE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER

SARAH L. CAVE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Dawn M. Joyner's (“Ms. Joyner”) “Bill of Complaint in Equity Presentment to Void Proceedings and Jurisdiction” (the “Bill”) dated June 30, 2022. (ECF No. 42). The Court construes the Bill as a proposed amended complaint. Accordingly, Ms. Joyner's request to amend the complaint is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pending resolution of the objections to the Report and Recommendation. (ECF Nos. 40-41).

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Ms. Joyner at the address below.

SO ORDERED.