From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joyce v. Warden Bray

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Aug 24, 2023
1:23CV707 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2023)

Opinion

1:23CV707

08-24-2023

EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN BRAY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

L. Patrick Auld, United States Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff, a prisoner of the State of North Carolina, submitted a letter detailing alleged violations of his rights. Therefore, the Court treated the filing as a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on the nature of Plaintiff s allegations. The form of the Complaint is such that serious flaws make it impossible to further process the Complaint. The problems are:

1. The filing fee was not received nor was a proper affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis submitted, with sufficient information completed or signed by Plaintiff, to permit review.
2. The Complaint is not on forms prescribed for use by this Court, nor is the information requested by such forms and necessary to process the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A contained in Plaintiffs submission. See LR 7.1(e).

Consequently, the Complaint should be dismissed, but without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects of the present Complaint. To further aid Plaintiff, the Clerk is instructed to send Plaintiff new § 1983 forms, instructions, an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and a copy of pertinent parts of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8 (i.e., Sections (a) & (d)).

In forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that In forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. The Clerk is instructed to send Plaintiff § 1983 forms, instructions, an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and a copy of pertinent parts of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8 (i.e., Sections (a) & (d)).

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new action, on the proper forms, which corrects the defects cited above.


Summaries of

Joyce v. Warden Bray

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Aug 24, 2023
1:23CV707 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Joyce v. Warden Bray

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN BRAY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Aug 24, 2023

Citations

1:23CV707 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2023)