From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joyce v. Texas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ABILENE DIVISION
Feb 2, 2021
No. 1:20-CV-145-H-BU (N.D. Tex. Feb. 2, 2021)

Opinion

No. 1:20-CV-145-H-BU

02-02-2021

ROBERT DAMIAN JOYCE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF TEXAS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge John R. Parker made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) in this case on December 2, 2020. Dkt. No. 19. Judge Parker recommended that the Court deny Robert Damian Joyce's two motions to certify a class action. Dkt. Nos. 5, 16; Id. at 7. No objections to the FCR were filed. The District Court has therefore reviewed the proposed FCR for clear error. Finding none, the Court accepts the FCR of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Joyce's motions to certify a class action are denied.

Where no specific objections are filed within the 14-day period, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendations only for clear error. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); see also Wilson v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., No. 3:12-CV-1063-B, 2013 WL 1880770, at *1 (N.D. Tex. May 6, 2013). --------

So ordered on February 2, 2021.

/s/_________

JAMES WESLEY HENDRIX

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Joyce v. Texas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ABILENE DIVISION
Feb 2, 2021
No. 1:20-CV-145-H-BU (N.D. Tex. Feb. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Joyce v. Texas

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT DAMIAN JOYCE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF TEXAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ABILENE DIVISION

Date published: Feb 2, 2021

Citations

No. 1:20-CV-145-H-BU (N.D. Tex. Feb. 2, 2021)