From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joyce v. Daily Mirror, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1933
239 App. Div. 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

May, 1933.


Order granting defendant's motion to strike case from the calendar reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The mistake made by the plaintiff's attorneys in the note of issue was one which may be corrected under section 105 of the Civil Practice Act and the note of issue amended accordingly, since it clearly did not prejudice any substantial right of the defendant. ( Gair v. Birmingham, 15 N.Y. Supp. 147 [not officially published]; Clinton v. Myers, 43 How. Pr. 95.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Joyce v. Daily Mirror, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1933
239 App. Div. 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Joyce v. Daily Mirror, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARY JOYCE, Appellant, v. DAILY MIRROR, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1933

Citations

239 App. Div. 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)