From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joyce v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Sep 20, 2017
ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-689-Y (N.D. Tex. Sep. 20, 2017)

Opinion

ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-689-Y

09-20-2017

GLENDA S. JOYCE v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

On August 31, 2017, the United States magistrate judge issued his report and recommendation in the above-styled and numbered cause. In that report, the magistrate judge gave all parties fourteen days thereafter to serve and file with the Court written objections to his report and recommendation. No written objections have been received from either party. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Assoc., 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996). As a result, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), de novo review is not required. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the magistrate judge's report and recommendation for plain error and has found none.

Thus, after consideration of this matter, the Court concludes that the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge should be and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with the magistrate judge's opinion.

SIGNED September 20, 2017.

/s/_________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Joyce v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Sep 20, 2017
ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-689-Y (N.D. Tex. Sep. 20, 2017)
Case details for

Joyce v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:GLENDA S. JOYCE v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: Sep 20, 2017

Citations

ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-689-Y (N.D. Tex. Sep. 20, 2017)

Citing Cases

Steele v. Berryhill

The ALJ's failure to specifically mention and consider Listing 14.02 was error at step three. Joyce v.…