From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Journey v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 21, 2016
Criminal Case Number 10-20113 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 21, 2016)

Opinion

Criminal Case Number 10-20113 Civil Case Number 13-13023

11-21-2016

RICARDO JOURNEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER VACATING SENTENCE AND DIRECTING PROBATION DEPARTMENT TO PREPARE NEW PRESENTENCE REPORT

On August 29, 2012, defendant Ricardo Journey was sentenced to a prison term of 180 months on his plea of guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and sentenced as an armed career criminal, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). On July 15, 2013, Journey filed a motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and on September 10, 2015 the Court allowed Journey to amend his motion in light of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551, 2563 (2015). In Johnson, the Supreme Court invalidated the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), as unconstitutionally vague, Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551, 2563 (2015), which was made retroactive to cases on collateral review by its decision in Welch v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 1257, 1268 (2016) ("Johnson announced a substantive rule that has retroactive effect in cases on collateral review.").

The petitioner was sentenced under the ACCA to the statutory mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years imprisonment because he had three prior convictions for a violent felony or controlled substance offense. One of those prior convictions, however, was for breaking and entering under Michigan Compiled Laws § 750.110. On October 26, 2016, the Sixth Circuit held that "a conviction under [Michigan Compiled Laws] § 750.110 cannot serve as a predicate offense under ACCA." United States v. Ritchey, 840 F.3d 310 (6th Cir. 2016). After the Sixth Circuit decided Ritchey, the Court directed the parties to file supplemental briefing addressing the Sixth Circuit's decision on this case. The parties filed their supplemental briefs and agreed that the ACCA no longer applies to Journey and that he should be resentenced. The Court agrees. Therefore, to the extent that the petitioner's motion to vacate challenges his status as an armed career criminal under the ACCA, his motion will be granted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the petitioner's motion to vacate his sentence [dkt. #19] is GRANTED. The petitioner's sentence is VACATED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

It is further ORDERED that the defendant shall be resentenced, and the probation department is directed to prepare a new presentence report.

s/David M. Lawson

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge Dated: November 21, 2016

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on November 21, 2016.

s/Susan Pinkowski

SUSAN PINKOWSKI


Summaries of

Journey v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 21, 2016
Criminal Case Number 10-20113 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 21, 2016)
Case details for

Journey v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RICARDO JOURNEY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 21, 2016

Citations

Criminal Case Number 10-20113 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 21, 2016)