From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jostock v. Mayfield Twp.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 18, 2023
995 N.W.2d 834 (Mich. 2023)

Opinion

SC: 165770 COA: 362635

10-18-2023

Ronald A. JOSTOCK and Susan J. Jostock, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MAYFIELD TOWNSHIP and Mayfield Township Board of Trustees, Defendants, and A2B Properties, LLC, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 1, 2023 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall address: (1) whether MCL 125.3405 allows for uses not otherwise authorized in a particular zone; (2) what mechanism was used to authorize the current use as a dragway, and whether that mechanism is available to authorize or expand the use of the appellant's property; (3) whether operation of a dragway is an authorized use under C-2; and (4) whether the township's conditional rezoning of the appellant's property is valid under MCL 125.3405. The time allowed for oral argument shall be 20 minutes for each side. MCR 7.314(B)(1).

The Michigan Townships Association, the Michigan Municipal League, the Government Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, and the Real Property Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


Summaries of

Jostock v. Mayfield Twp.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 18, 2023
995 N.W.2d 834 (Mich. 2023)
Case details for

Jostock v. Mayfield Twp.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD A. JOSTOCK and SUSAN J. JOSTOCK, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MAYFIELD…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Oct 18, 2023

Citations

995 N.W.2d 834 (Mich. 2023)