From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Josey v. N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 10, 2008
50 A.D.3d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 3348.

April 10, 2008.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered December 4, 2006, which annulled the determination of respondent Police Pension Fund Board of Trustees denying petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement (ADR) benefits, and directed respondent to grant petitioner ADR benefits, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition denied and the proceeding dismissed.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Elizabeth I. Freedman of counsel), for appellants.

Michael T. Murray, New York (Christopher J. McGrath of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Gonzalez, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley and Catterson, JJ.


Respondent's determination was based on "some credible evidence" and was not arbitrary or capricious ( see Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756, 760-761). There is no evidence in the record that supports petitioner's belated claim that his injury occurred in the line of duty.

We note that, upon finding that there was no credible evidence to support respondent's determination, the court should have remanded the proceeding for further consideration ( Matter of Perkins v Board of Trustees of N.Y. Fire Dept. Art. 1-B Pension Fund, 86 AD2d 808).


Summaries of

Josey v. N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 10, 2008
50 A.D.3d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Josey v. N.Y

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ERIC JOSEY, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 10, 2008

Citations

50 A.D.3d 393 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 3129
854 N.Y.S.2d 311