Opinion
2:22-cv-000623-CDS-VCF
08-25-2022
MICHELE JOSEPH, individually; Plaintiff, v. MANASO INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Defendant.
FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP, Steve A. Miller, Esq. . MARIAN L. MASSEY, ESQ., STEVE A. MILLER, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT P. SPRETNAK, Owen B. Dunn, Esq., ROBERT P. SPRETNAK, ESQ., OWEN B. DUNN, JR. The Law Offices of Owen Dunn Jr. Attorneys for Plaintiff
FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP, Steve A. Miller, Esq. . MARIAN L. MASSEY, ESQ., STEVE A. MILLER, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT P. SPRETNAK, Owen B. Dunn, Esq., ROBERT P. SPRETNAK, ESQ., OWEN B. DUNN, JR. The Law Offices of Owen Dunn Jr. Attorneys for Plaintiff
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT MANASO INVESTMENTS, LLC TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
This is the Parties' Second Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint, but it is the third request for an extension of the time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (See ECF Nos. 11, 14).
The Parties, Plaintiff Michele Joseph and Defendant Manaso Investments, LLC, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by fourteen (14) days, up to and including September 8, 2022. This is the second Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint, and the third request for an extension of time to answer the Complaint in this matter. The Parties are engaged in ongoing settlement negotiations and respectfully request additional time to evaluate early dispute resolution prior to Defendant's response to the allegations raised in Plaintiff's Complaint.
The Parties respectfully submit that the requested extension is sought in good faith, not for the purposes of delay, and it does not cause unfair prejudice to either side.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.