From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph v. Leblanc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 6, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-229-SDD-SCR (M.D. La. Jun. 6, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-229-SDD-SCR

06-06-2014

EUGENE JOSEPH (#171436) v. JAMES LEBLANC, ET AL.


RULING

The Court has carefully considered the Complaint , the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated May 7, 2014. Plaintiff has filed an Objection which the Court has also considered.

Rec. Doc. 1.

Rec. Doc. 43.

Rec. Doc. 44.

The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.

Accordingly, the Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment will be granted and this action will be dismissed without prejudice to any state law claim. The claims against J. R. Hornea, D. White, J. Coleman, and the three unidentified John Doe Defendants will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 4(m), Fed.R.Civ.P.

Rec. Doc. 28.
--------

Baton Rouge, Louisiana the 6 day of June, 2014.

__________

SHELLY D. DICK, DISTRICT JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Joseph v. Leblanc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 6, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-229-SDD-SCR (M.D. La. Jun. 6, 2014)
Case details for

Joseph v. Leblanc

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE JOSEPH (#171436) v. JAMES LEBLANC, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jun 6, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-229-SDD-SCR (M.D. La. Jun. 6, 2014)