From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 9, 2011
2:09-cv-00966-HDM-LRL (D. Nev. Mar. 9, 2011)

Opinion

2:09-cv-00966-HDM-LRL.

March 9, 2011


ORDER


Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment (#73). Plaintiffs responded to the motion for summary judgment and requested a stay of the motion pending resolution of several outstanding discovery disputes (#85). Plaintiffs simultaneously filed a motion to strike exhibits in support of defendants' motion for summary judgment (#86). Defendants have responded to the motion to strike (#92).

There are two pending discovery motions: defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery on Plaintiffs' Monell Claim (#75) and plaintiffs' Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines and for Sanctions (#88).

Having reviewed the pleadings and papers on file, the court hereby orders that defendants' motion for summary judgement (#73) and plaintiffs' motion to strike (#86) are STAYED until all discovery disputes are resolved and discovery is closed, or until further order of this court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 9th day of March 2011.


Summaries of

Joseph v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 9, 2011
2:09-cv-00966-HDM-LRL (D. Nev. Mar. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Joseph v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Case Details

Full title:RONALD NEAL JOSEPH, SR., et al. Plaintiffs, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Mar 9, 2011

Citations

2:09-cv-00966-HDM-LRL (D. Nev. Mar. 9, 2011)