From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph v. Laclair

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 23, 2010
79 A.D.3d 1496 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 509455.

December 23, 2010.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered February 19, 2010 in Franklin County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Nigel Joseph, Malone, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Peters, J.P., Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ.


Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of being out of place and refusing a direct order as a result of being in the slop sink area after he was confined to his cell due to pending disciplinary charges. The determination was later affirmed on administrative appeal. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination, which was dismissed by Supreme Court. Petitioner now appeals and we affirm.

Petitioner's sole claim on appeal — that the Hearing Officer erroneously failed to consider his mental health status in rendering the determination — was not preserved for our review, as it was not raised as a defense to the disciplinary charges ( see Matter of Spirles v Goord, 308 AD2d 610, 611). In fact, petitioner declined to call any witnesses or present any documentary evidence relative thereto. Moreover, inasmuch as petitioner failed to establish the relevance of his alleged mental health status, the Hearing Officer was not required to consider it ( see id.). Therefore, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Joseph v. Laclair

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 23, 2010
79 A.D.3d 1496 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Joseph v. Laclair

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NIGEL JOSEPH, Appellant, v. DARWIN LACLAIR, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 23, 2010

Citations

79 A.D.3d 1496 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 9436
912 N.Y.S.2d 464

Citing Cases

Nieves v. Annucci

cer who assisted in the search of the cell, petitioner did not demonstrate that the assisting officer had…

Ferguson v. Fischer

ement that an item that is classified as a dangerous instrument be contraband was eliminated by an amendment…