From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph v. Kalmanowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 15, 1951
278 App. Div. 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

January 15, 1951.


Appeal from a judgment entered after default of appellants' counsel in appearing until after a witness had been sworn and testified for respondent in a directed inquest, and from an order denying appellants' motion to vacate the judgment and open the default. Judgment and order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and appellants' motion to vacate their default and to set the case down for trial granted, without costs. It is our opinion that in the interest of justice a trial of the issues should be had, with both parties represented by counsel throughout. Under the circumstances here disclosed, the court should not have directed an inquest in the absence of appellants' counsel, who was then in consultation with another Justice of the court about another action then on the ready calendar; and should have acceded to the request of respondent's counsel, upon the return of appellants' counsel to the courtroom, to expunge the testimony theretofore taken and to begin the trial anew. Carswell, Acting P.J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Joseph v. Kalmanowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 15, 1951
278 App. Div. 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Joseph v. Kalmanowitz

Case Details

Full title:ROSE JOSEPH, Respondent, v. RUTH KALMANOWITZ et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 15, 1951

Citations

278 App. Div. 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)