In Joseph v. Hummel, 21 Misc.3d 1105(A)(Sup. Ct. Queens County 2008), the defendants' two medical experts stated different normal range of motion for the cervical spine and the lumbar spine.
Summary of this case from Ansari v. ButtSeptember 5, 2008.
Insurance — No-Fault Automobile Insurance — Serious Injury.
In Joseph v. Hummel, 21 Misc.3d 1105(A)(Sup. Ct. Queens County 2008), the defendants' two medical experts stated different normal range of motion for the cervical spine and the lumbar spine.
Summary of this case from Ansari v. ButtFull title:Joseph v. Hummel
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Queens County
Date published: Sep 5, 2008
Although the defendants' examining neurologist and orthopedist each quantified the ranges of motion they…
Khaimovich v. DefossettPlaintiff also claims that defendant's medical expert, Dr. Spataro, did not compare his results to the…