From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph v. GRBSGG, LLC

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 9, 2011
Case No. 2:08-cv-01180-HDM-GWF (D. Nev. Feb. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08-cv-01180-HDM-GWF.

February 9, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5). The Stipulation to Extend Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#65) filed August 24, 2010, required the parties to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5) no later than February 9, 2011. There are no dispositive motions pending. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that

1. Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than February 22, 2011. Failure to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including a recommendation to the District Judge that the complaint be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to prosecute. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).
2. The disclosures required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(3) and any objections thereto shall be included in the pretrial order.

DATED this 9th day of February, 2011.


Summaries of

Joseph v. GRBSGG, LLC

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 9, 2011
Case No. 2:08-cv-01180-HDM-GWF (D. Nev. Feb. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Joseph v. GRBSGG, LLC

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE JOSEPH, et. al. Plaintiffs, v. GRBSGG, LLC, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Feb 9, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:08-cv-01180-HDM-GWF (D. Nev. Feb. 9, 2011)