Opinion
May 13, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.).
It was not an abuse of discretion to grant plaintiff's cross motion to serve an amended bill of particulars absent a showing by defendant that the amended bill of particulars would cause it prejudice (Scarangello v State of New York, 111 A.D.2d 798; Koch v St. Francis Hosp., 112 A.D.2d 142). The amendment will not preclude cross-examination on, or diminish the importance of, the earlier inconsistency (Gonzalez v Colella, 55 A.D.2d 534).
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.