From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Aug 19, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20cv191 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 19, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20cv191

08-19-2020

CAREY SEBASTIAN JOSEPH, #02199314 v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner Carey Joseph, a prisoner confined at the Coffield Unit within the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), proceeding pro se, filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petition was referred to United States Magistrate Judge, the Honorable John D. Love, for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

On July 17, 2020, Judge Love issued a Report recommending that Petitioner's habeas petition be dismissed without prejudice for Petitioner's failure to comply with an order of the Court (Docket No. 12). Specifically, Judge Love found that Petitioner failed to comply with the May 24, 2020 order directing him to pay the requisite $5.00 filing fee within thirty days of receipt (Docket No. 9). A copy of Judge Love's Report was sent to Petitioner; however, to date, the Court has received neither objections to the Report nor the $5.00 filing fee. Petitioner has not communicated with the Court since May 2020.

Because objections to Judge Love's Report have not been filed, Petitioner is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. United Services Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 3243 (1989) (holding that where no objections to a Magistrate Judge's Report are filed, the standard of review is "clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law."). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, (Docket No. 12), is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Further, it is

ORDERED that the above-styled habeas action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for Petitioner's failure to comply with an order of the Court. Finally, it is

ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 19th day of August, 2020.

/s/_________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Joseph v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Aug 19, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20cv191 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 19, 2020)
Case details for

Joseph v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

Case Details

Full title:CAREY SEBASTIAN JOSEPH, #02199314 v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Aug 19, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:20cv191 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 19, 2020)