From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph v. Dear

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Oct 19, 2023
2:23-cv-901-SPC-NPM (M.D. Fla. Oct. 19, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-901-SPC-NPM

10-19-2023

KENEL JOSEPH, Plaintiff, v. DALE DEAR, DAVID CRISP and RICK DAVIS, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Kenel Joseph's civil rights Complaint. (Doc. 1). Joseph-a prisoner of the Florida Department of Corrections-moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2). Because Joseph is barred from doing so under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), the Court dismisses this action without prejudice.

Under § 1915(g), a prisoner cannot proceed in forma pauperis if “on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, [he] brought an action or appeal in a [federal] court...that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state claim upon which relief may be granted[.]” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); see Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez, 140 S.Ct. 1721, 1723 (2020) (“To help staunch a ‘flood of nonmeritorious' prisoner litigation, the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA) established what has become known as the three-strikes rule.” (citation omitted)). And “[a] dismissal of a suit for failure to state a claim counts as a strike, whether or not with prejudice.” Lomax, 140 S.Ct. at 1727.

The Court takes judicial notice of Joseph's three prior federal lawsuits, all of which were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or failing to state claim upon which relief may be granted: Cases Nos. (1) 2:23-cv-255-SPC-NPM (failure to state a claim); (2) 2:23-cv-564-SPC-NPM (failure to state a claim); and (3) 2:23-cv-578-SPC-NPM (frivolous). Joseph is not exempt from § 1915(g)'s three-strikes rule, as the Complaint does not allege he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. Mitchell v. Nobles, 873 F.3d 869, 872 (11th Cir. 2017).

The Court thus dismisses the Complaint without prejudice. If Kenel Joseph wishes to pursue his claim(s), he must file a new complaint-under a new case number-and pay the $402.00 filing fee.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

1. Kenel Joseph's Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment, terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and close this file.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Joseph v. Dear

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Oct 19, 2023
2:23-cv-901-SPC-NPM (M.D. Fla. Oct. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Joseph v. Dear

Case Details

Full title:KENEL JOSEPH, Plaintiff, v. DALE DEAR, DAVID CRISP and RICK DAVIS…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Oct 19, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-901-SPC-NPM (M.D. Fla. Oct. 19, 2023)