From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph v. Brodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 24, 1995
220 A.D.2d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 24, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.).


The conflicting affidavits and deposition testimony of the parties and their experts raise issues of fact precluding summary judgment, including, with respect to defendant Cohen, whether he recommended to the decedent on her initial visit to him in January 1984 that she undergo a course of adjuvant therapy, and, if not, whether the failure to do so was malpractice that diminished the decedent's chances of survival, and, with respect to defendant Brodman, whether he recommended adjuvant therapy after the February 1983 mastectomy his associate performed.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Asch and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Joseph v. Brodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 24, 1995
220 A.D.2d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Joseph v. Brodman

Case Details

Full title:JAMES JOSEPH, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 24, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 942

Citing Cases

Almonte v. Shaukat

Medical Association policy, "physician[s] must review the [physician assistants’] work to ensure conformity…

Almonte v. Shaukat

sure conformity with the standard of care, not to simply rubberstamp medical records for 'administrative'…