From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Joseph P. Day Realty Corp. v. Hume Publishing, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 1996
224 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 5, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J., Burchell, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the second amended judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the second amended judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the second amended judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

In Day Realty Corp. v. Hume Publ. ( 204 A.D.2d 278), this Court remitted this matter to the Supreme Court to determine the proper amount owed to the plaintiff pursuant to the escalation clauses of the subject lease. Contrary to the defendants' contention, the Supreme Court did not err in refusing to conduct a new trial to determine the escalation costs since this Court determined on the original appeal that the plaintiff had proven its claim for damages. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly relied upon the evidence submitted at the original trial to determine the escalation costs. Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Thompson and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Joseph P. Day Realty Corp. v. Hume Publishing, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 1996
224 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Joseph P. Day Realty Corp. v. Hume Publishing, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH P. DAY REALTY CORP., Respondent, v. HUME PUBLISHING, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 776