From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Maiorana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Mar 16, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-103 SECTION P (W.D. La. Mar. 16, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-103 SECTION P

03-16-2015

JOSEPH BROME JACKSON FED. REG. #10865-017 v. WARDEN MAIORANA


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

There being no objection to the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, these findings and conclusions are accepted. Alternatively, this court concludes that the proposed findings and conclusions are entirely correct. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED THAT the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because the court lacks jurisdiction to consider these claims.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, Lake Charles, Louisiana, on this 16th day of March, 2015.

/s/ _________

JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jackson v. Maiorana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Mar 16, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-103 SECTION P (W.D. La. Mar. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Jackson v. Maiorana

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH BROME JACKSON FED. REG. #10865-017 v. WARDEN MAIORANA

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Mar 16, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-103 SECTION P (W.D. La. Mar. 16, 2015)