Jorgensen v. City of Palm Desert

Full title: ROBERT E. JORGENSEN, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PALM DESERT, a…

Court: United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 16, 2021

5:20-cv-01043-CBM-KKx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2021)

Opinion

5:20-cv-01043-CBM-KKx

12-16-2021

ROBERT E. JORGENSEN, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PALM DESERT, a municipal corporation; PALM DESERT POLICE DEPARTMENT; COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; STEVEN NELSON, an individual; MANUEL BUSTILLOS, an individual; MICHELLE PLOESCH, an individual; and DOES 1-5, inclusive, Defendant.

Dean Gazzo Roistacher LLP Mitchell D. Dean, Esq. (SBN 128926) Stephanie M. Skees, Esq. (SBN 263962) Attorneys for Defendants City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, Riverside County Sheriff's Department, Steven Nelson, Manuel Bustillos, and Michelle Ploesch

Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall United States District Judge

Complaint Filed: May 19, 2020

Trial Dated: January 18, 2022

Dean Gazzo Roistacher LLP Mitchell D. Dean, Esq. (SBN 128926) Stephanie M. Skees, Esq. (SBN 263962) Attorneys for Defendants City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, Riverside County Sheriff's Department, Steven Nelson, Manuel Bustillos, and Michelle Ploesch

Kenly Kiya Kato Magistrate

ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [JS-6]

Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall United States District Judge

Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby GRANTS the stipulation and ORDERS the following:

1. Plaintiff's entire Second Amended Complaint (the operative complaint) against all defendants, including all causes of action alleged therein, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

2. All parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.