Opinion
2:21-cv-02228-CDS-NJK
12-22-2022
CHRISTINA JORDAN, et al., Plaintiff, v. WYNDHAM VACATION OWNERSHIP, INC., a Nevada corporation; DEMETRIUS BARNES, an individual; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES, I through X, inclusive, Defendants.
HONE LAW, Jill Garcia, NV Bar No. 7805, Attorneys for Plaintiffs Renee Dean, Christina Jordan, and Wendy Regge. JACKSON LEWIS P.C., Kyle J. Hoyt, NV State Bar No. 14886, Attorneys for Defendants Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc. and Demetrius Barnes.
HONE LAW, Jill Garcia, NV Bar No. 7805, Attorneys for Plaintiffs Renee Dean, Christina Jordan, and Wendy Regge.
JACKSON LEWIS P.C., Kyle J. Hoyt, NV State Bar No. 14886, Attorneys for Defendants Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc. and Demetrius Barnes.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST)
Plaintiffs Renee Dean (“Dean”), Christina Jordan (“Jordan”), and Wendy Regge (“Regge,” and collectively “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc. (“Wyndham”) and Demetrius Barnes (“Baines,” collectively “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby file this Stipulation and Order to Extend Deadline for Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (First Request).
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Plaintiffs shall have an extension up to and including January 10, 2023 to file their- responses to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count IV of Plaintiff Chr istina Jordan's Complaint for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress filed on December 12, 2022 [ECF No. 28], Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Renee Dean's Complaint filed on December 12, 2022 [ECF No. 29], and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts II and V of Plaintiff Wendy Regge's Complaint filed on December 12, 2022 [ECF No. 30] (collectively “Motions to Dismiss). This Stipulation is submitted and based upon the following:
1. The departure of Kathryn Newman, lead counsel for Plaintiffs, has had an impact on the status of litigation in a number of matters adding to the already challenging nature of managing litigation dining the holiday season.
2. This is the fir st request for an extension of time for Plaintiffs to file a response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss.
IT IS SO ORDERED.