From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jordan v. Walters et al

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Dec 19, 1921
118 S.C. 251 (S.C. 1921)

Opinion

10790

December 19, 1921.

Before PEURIFOY, J., April, 1921. Affirmed.

Action by J.N. Jordan against E.W. Walters and H. L. Camritz, Jr. From order striking out answer and giving judgment for plaintiff the defendants appeal.

Messrs. Tatum Jennings, for appellants, cite: Frivolous and sham answers and defenses: Code Proc. 1912, Secs. 306; 202; 97 S.C. 389; 6 S.C. 113; 9 S.C. 438; 20 Enc. Pl. Pr. 13; 31 Cyc. 623; 50 S.C. 54; 2 S.C. 422; 27 S.C. 164; 54 S.C. 400; 85 S.C. 338; 88 S.C. 496; 3 Bail. 42; 6 S.C. 485; 37 S.C. 145; 67 S.C. 456.

Messrs. McLeod Dennis, for respondents.


December 19, 1921. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


This is an appeal from an order of Judge Peurifoy, striking out answer of defendants and giving plaintiff judgment. The order must be affirmed, as the answer pleads no defense.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Jordan v. Walters et al

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Dec 19, 1921
118 S.C. 251 (S.C. 1921)
Case details for

Jordan v. Walters et al

Case Details

Full title:JORDAN v. WALTERS ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 19, 1921

Citations

118 S.C. 251 (S.C. 1921)
110 S.E. 110

Citing Cases

Duncan v. Record Publishing Co. et al

Messrs. C.N. Sapp and W.C. McLain, for Record Publishing Co., appellant, cite: Extent of legislative…

Columbia Weighing Machine Co. v. Rhem

Bank Reference: 1st Natl. Bank. Messrs. C.W. Muldrow and J.M. McIntosh, for appellant, cite: Answer does not…